Does anyone know sarah paisner

The premise of the play is engaging, but Lane doesn't spend enough time developing it. Rather than finding more places to insert harbingers of the climax, she fills those holes with details that are either uninteresting or veering in a different direction. Sir Craig pops up way too many times in the form of both creepy and earnest personal ads, and the subject of domestic violence is introduced, but not threaded into the plot well. In spite of being a battered wife and having the aberrant sexual streak that is created within her as a result, Ginger is not a very sympathetic character.

The attempts to make Merry appear even remotely sexually deviant fall flat due to direction and perhaps her own reservedness. And if she can't drum up any sympathy for being beat up and being desperate, it's even worse for the other, half-developed, characters. As the Woman, Jackler is a half-menacing, half-cackling ghost, but the persona she creates doesn't mesh well with the true identity, or lack thereof, of her character. Does Anyone Know Sarah Paisner? At 80 minutes, there's not a lot there to pare down, but there is enough there to be re-imagined.

If the playwright spends more time revealing who Sarah Paisner is, perhaps we'll want to figure out the rest. As it stands, the revelation isn't worth the wait. By the time you get your meal, you'll already be fed up with the service. Through March 2nd. Post a Comment. Writers for the New Theater Corps are given the opportunity to immerse themselves in the off-off and off-Broadway theater scene, learning and giving back high-quality reviews at the same time.

Driven by a passion and love of the arts, the New Theater Corps aims to identify, support, and grow the arts community, one show and one person at a time. Thematically, this show is all over the place.

Is it a commentary on the craigslist phenomenon or a portrait of a narcissistic artist? Is it an unusual look at domestic violence or the plight of a ghost?

The script tries to link all four with a meddling boyfriend and a charming roommate, but doesn't succeed.

In addition to not having any focus, this show also lacks sympathetic characters. After spending a good portion of the play waiting to be entertained and enlightened, you won't care when you get both in the end.

Too little, too late. No comments:. The entries she reads are acted out behind shadow screens by a chorus of performers. But this momentum is not sustained throughout this one act mystery play of sorts. It becomes clear that there is some sort of identity mystery going on between these two. The ghost, unconvincingly, says she is Sarah Paisner, yet the sound of the name seems to torture Ginger.

And can we change who we are, or are we too rooted in our past, and in our identity, no matter how deeply we want out? The performances feel uneven, but this may be more due to the directing: much time seemed to have been spent on developing Ginger, played sensitively by Kathryn Merry, while the others felt like fragments of people. But the result is a play that feels unfinished and, ultimately, unrelatable.